header-logo header-logo

Missing the point?

14 March 2014 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Was the claim by the black cab rapist's victims in the public interest? The High Court side-stepped the key issue says Jon Holbrook 

On public policy grounds victims of a flawed police investigation have never before been able to sue a police force for damages. Last month the law changed when the High Court allowed two victims of the “black cab rapist”, John Worboys, to receive damages from the Metropolitan Police (DSD v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 436 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 76 (Mar)). Yet the public policy reasons for previously disallowing these claims have not been answered, in fact they have not even been addressed.

John Worboys drugged and then raped or sexually assaulted over 100 women in his black cab over a period of six years that ended with his arrest in 2008. The serial rapist was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2009. As a result of last month’s judgment any victim of “particularly severe violent acts” will now be able to sue the police if the police investigation is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll