header-logo header-logo

Missing the point?

14 March 2014 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Was the claim by the black cab rapist's victims in the public interest? The High Court side-stepped the key issue says Jon Holbrook 

On public policy grounds victims of a flawed police investigation have never before been able to sue a police force for damages. Last month the law changed when the High Court allowed two victims of the “black cab rapist”, John Worboys, to receive damages from the Metropolitan Police (DSD v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWHC 436 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 76 (Mar)). Yet the public policy reasons for previously disallowing these claims have not been answered, in fact they have not even been addressed.

John Worboys drugged and then raped or sexually assaulted over 100 women in his black cab over a period of six years that ended with his arrest in 2008. The serial rapist was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2009. As a result of last month’s judgment any victim of “particularly severe violent acts” will now be able to sue the police if the police investigation is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll