header-logo header-logo

Mitigation a major factor in sentencing

25 October 2007
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

News

Personal mitigation plays an important part in sentencing decisions and can be the decisive factor in choosing a community penalty in preference to imprisonment, a new study shows.

Mitigation: The Role of Personal Factors in Sentencing, carried out by the Institute for Criminal Policy Research, King’s College London and the Prison Reform Trust, charts the range of personal and social factors that judges take into account in passing sentence.

In almost half the 162 cases observed in the study, judges cited at least some factor of personal mitigation as relevant to sentencing.
In around a third of the 127 cases where the judge made the role of mitigation explicit, personal mitigation was usually the major factor which pulled the sentence back from immediate custody.

In about a quarter of these cases, mitigation including personal factors resulted in a shorter custodial sentence.

Professor Mike Hough, of King’s College London, says: “Sentencing is often about balancing offender and offence-related factors. If justice is to be achieved, sentencing has to be tailored to the individual. Mitigation needs to be recognised more fully as an important element of the sentencing process.”

Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll