header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Human rights
printer mail-detail

MOANERS STAY MASKED

In brief

Comments that are strictly defamatory can still be so trivial that they do not merit an invasion of the authors’ privacy rights, the High Court has ruled. The court refused to allow the identities of seven people who had attacked directors of football club, Sheffield Wednesday, on a website message board to be revealed. Seven club directors had sought a court order to force Neil Hargreaves to identify 11 members who had posted allegedly defamatory comments on his site under pseudonyms. However, the court said it would not be right to make an order for the disclosure of the identities of users who have posted messages which are “barely defamatory or little more than abusive or likely to be understood as jokes”. It said the court must be careful not to unjustifiably invade an individual’s privacy.

Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll