header-logo header-logo

24 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoD duty of care

Court of Appeal rules on MoD safety duty to serving soldiers

The Ministry of Defence has a duty to provide serving soldiers with safe equipment, and failure to do so means it can be found liable if soldiers are injured or killed, the Court of Appeal has ruled. Smith & Ors v MoD [2012] EWCA Civ 1365, also known as “the Snatch Land Rover case”, was brought by the families of soldiers killed in Iraq.

The families argued the deaths could have been avoided if the tank and Land Rover in which the soldiers died had been better equipped. The Court rejected the MoD’s defence of “combat immunity”, that it does not owe service personnel a civil duty of care.

Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James expands national Serious Injury team with two new Partners

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW continues Paris office growth with public law Partner hire

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll