header-logo header-logo

30 October 2015
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Modern Slavery Act 2015 Regulations in force

The Modern Slavery Act 2015 Regulations came into force this week, requiring certain businesses to report annually on the steps they have taken to guard against slavery and human trafficking in their company or supply chain.  

The requirement applies to companies with a turnover of £36m per year or more, which are incorporated in the UK or carry on a business here. They must publish a link to the report in a prominent place on their website.

Zee Hussain, employment partner at Simpson Millar, says: “Businesses likely to be affected need to start thinking about what they need to do to ensure they can make the required statement.

“They need to, first, take steps to investigate and to ensure slavery and human trafficking is not taking place; second, investigate and gain an understanding of how the business engages with suppliers and partner organisations to ensure the same; and third, investigate and identify any gaps in processes across the business, then design and implement measures to strengthen these. Businesses will also need to be prepared to engage with interested stakeholders following the publication of their statement.”

Claire Pardo, corporate associate at Withers, highlighted the key points for companies to consider:

  • the reports are meant to be an evolving disclosure not a one-off exercise;
  • organisations that primarily pursue charitable or educational aims are still required to produce the reports;
  • the guidance to assist parent companies to determine which subsidiaries need to be taken into account in the report “is unclear and raises more questions than it answers”; and
  • organisations should review their performance indicators and incentives to ensure they do not create risks, for example, on shipment "turn-around" time.
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll