header-logo header-logo

06 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ attack

MoJ's proposals for judicial review reform face criticism

Lawyers’ groups have criticised the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) proposals for further reforms to judicial review for not having a sound evidence base. The MoJ set out its proposals in its consultation, Judicial review: proposals for further reform. In its response, CILEx said the paper referred to government “concerns” but these were based on “assertions and assumptions”.

Also responding to the paper, the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association said the paper “repeatedly makes assertions unsupported by evidence”, for example no evidence was given for the claim that judicial review is sometimes used as a delaying tactic in cases that have little or no prospect of success.

Issue: 7583 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll