header-logo header-logo

13 July 2017
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ moves to stem bout of post-holiday sickness claims

A loophole excluding holiday sickness claims from the fixed recoverable costs regime could be closed to tackle a surge in suspicious claims, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said.

Currently, most personal injury claims are subject to fixed recoverable costs—but not where the incident happened abroad. The MoJ said this week it was responding to travel industry concerns over increasing numbers of suspected bogus claims for gastric illnesses, with some touts operating in European resorts.

It said a 500% rise in claims since 2013 has not been matched in other countries, and warned the trend risks driving up package holiday costs as well as ruining the reputation of Brits abroad. Tour operators say the cost of fighting claims can be out of proportion to the damages claimed, since legal costs are not controlled.

Helen Pugh, barrister at 3 Hare Court, said: ‘It is surely undeniable that there are surprising numbers of claimants and “enablers” who are abusing the system by bringing fraudulent sickness claims.

‘But are fixed fees the way forward? So-called “sickness claims” often involve complicated microbiological disputes about the source of the illness, be it contaminated food or a virus or something else.

‘Injury cases, and some illness cases, will depend upon expert evidence from specialists in standards in the holiday jurisdiction. Analysing this evidence, devising tactics and contentious hearings will frequently require counsel’s involvement.

‘The success and fairness of any fixed fee regime will need to reflect the variety, complexity and intrinsic cost of running many of these types of claims. Get the balance right and fraudsters beware. Get the balance wrong and all claimants beware.’

Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll