header-logo header-logo

MoJ moves to stem bout of post-holiday sickness claims

13 July 2017
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A loophole excluding holiday sickness claims from the fixed recoverable costs regime could be closed to tackle a surge in suspicious claims, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said.

Currently, most personal injury claims are subject to fixed recoverable costs—but not where the incident happened abroad. The MoJ said this week it was responding to travel industry concerns over increasing numbers of suspected bogus claims for gastric illnesses, with some touts operating in European resorts.

It said a 500% rise in claims since 2013 has not been matched in other countries, and warned the trend risks driving up package holiday costs as well as ruining the reputation of Brits abroad. Tour operators say the cost of fighting claims can be out of proportion to the damages claimed, since legal costs are not controlled.

Helen Pugh, barrister at 3 Hare Court, said: ‘It is surely undeniable that there are surprising numbers of claimants and “enablers” who are abusing the system by bringing fraudulent sickness claims.

‘But are fixed fees the way forward? So-called “sickness claims” often involve complicated microbiological disputes about the source of the illness, be it contaminated food or a virus or something else.

‘Injury cases, and some illness cases, will depend upon expert evidence from specialists in standards in the holiday jurisdiction. Analysing this evidence, devising tactics and contentious hearings will frequently require counsel’s involvement.

‘The success and fairness of any fixed fee regime will need to reflect the variety, complexity and intrinsic cost of running many of these types of claims. Get the balance right and fraudsters beware. Get the balance wrong and all claimants beware.’

Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll