header-logo header-logo

MoJ proposes clampdown on claims farmers’ fee rates

18 February 2016
Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

High fees charged by claims management companies (CMCs) are to be capped

Consumers targeted by CMCs over payment protection insurance and similar claims are often hit by rip-off fees of as much as 40% of any compensation. The Financial Conduct Authority has reported that, since 2011, over £21bn has been paid out to consumers for Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) claims alone. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) estimates that CMCs may have taken as much as £3.5bn in charges since that date. For the year ending March 2015, more than 200,000 new PPI claims were received by the Financial Ombudsman Service, of which 79% were lodged by CMCs on behalf of consumers, and around 20% came from consumers directly.

MoJ proposals launched last week would cap the completion fee at 15% for bulk claims such as mis-sold payment protection insurance, and cap the overall charge for claims worth more than £2,000 at £300. The maximum completion fee for other types of financial claims would be 25% of the final amount of compensation awarded. CMCs would also be banned from charging upfront fees for financial claims before any work is carried out, from charging cancellation fees of more than £300 for bulk claims, and from charging referral fees for introducing a consumer to a third party.

Justice Minister Lord Faulks says: “Some claims management companies charge as much as 40% of the final compensation awarded for very little work. This has got to stop.”

Kevin Rousell, head of the Claims Management Regulator, says: “We want to make sure that people who use CMCs can be confident they are getting value for money and are not being exploited.” The regulator has cancelled more than 1,000 CMC licences since 2010.

The MoJ is holding an eight-week consultation.

Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll