header-logo header-logo

Money laundering burden increases

26 February 2009
Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Regulation

A Law Society review into how solicitors’ firms have implemented the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 found two-thirds of solicitors felt supported by the Law Society in meeting their obligations. Most firms have updated their policies and procedures and trained the majority of staff in the new requirements. However, practitioners also said they faced too much red tape.
The review found:
 64% said the greatest deterrent for use of the reliance provisions was the fact they remained criminally liable for any omissions committed by the person they relied on;
 43% found it difficult to find enough information to apply simplified due diligence;
 a third of respondents had turned down a retainer from an exposed person, due to the perceived risk of the client; and
 there was a general perception that costs have increased since the introduction of the 2007 Regulations.
Alison Matthews, chairman of the Law Society’s Money Laundering Task Force says: “We see these results as a useful starting point to generate discussions about how we can work together with the profession.”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll