header-logo header-logo

Money laundering burden increases

26 February 2009
Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Regulation

A Law Society review into how solicitors’ firms have implemented the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 found two-thirds of solicitors felt supported by the Law Society in meeting their obligations. Most firms have updated their policies and procedures and trained the majority of staff in the new requirements. However, practitioners also said they faced too much red tape.
The review found:
 64% said the greatest deterrent for use of the reliance provisions was the fact they remained criminally liable for any omissions committed by the person they relied on;
 43% found it difficult to find enough information to apply simplified due diligence;
 a third of respondents had turned down a retainer from an exposed person, due to the perceived risk of the client; and
 there was a general perception that costs have increased since the introduction of the 2007 Regulations.
Alison Matthews, chairman of the Law Society’s Money Laundering Task Force says: “We see these results as a useful starting point to generate discussions about how we can work together with the profession.”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll