header-logo header-logo

08 May 2015 / Alexander Hill-Smith
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Money, money money…

nlj_may_8_alexander-hill-smith

Alexander Hill-Smith reviews the new regime for high-cost short-term lending

In recent years, there has been increasing concern about the scale of high-cost short-term borrowing (HCSTC). The volume of transactions is large; borrowers entered into 10.2 million loans of this type totaling £2.8bn in the calendar year 2012/2013. Since then, there has been a decline, perhaps on account of the adverse publicity HCSTC has received, but the volume and amount lent is still considerable. Many of the loans are for small amounts, the average being £260, but there is no financial ceiling on the size of a HCSTC loan.

Public concern is fully justified. These agreements are inevitably expensive in proportion to the size of the advance. While the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recognised that a legitimate role exists for such agreements to cater for situations of temporary financial emergency of a non-recurrent nature, it is plain that hardship has occurred because too many agreements have been entered into in the past. In particular loans have been made to persons unable to repay

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll