header-logo header-logo

18 March 2016 / Robin Denford
Issue: 7691 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail

More than LIP service

001_nlj_7691_denford

Unbundling cases could offer a helping hand to litigants in person, as Robin Denford explains

Lord Justice Briggs’s ongoing consideration and review of reforms to the civil courts structure includes considering what steps could be taken to minimise the impact and struggles of the increasing number of litigants in person (LIP) in the court system. This is of particular interest as I am part of a working group in Bristol County Court, guided by DJ Cope, which is focused on what additional support can be given to litigants in person.

One suggestion I made, after a recent directions hearing over a possession case, was that my instructing solicitor could send a blank “List of Documents” form to the defendant to complete so that he could comply with the direction for disclosure. This would be sent along with a template for a witness statement to help him with the structure of the statements he would have to produce to refute the council’s claim for possession. I have also suggested that all court orders could contain a link

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll