header-logo header-logo

18 March 2016 / Robin Denford
Issue: 7691 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail

More than LIP service

001_nlj_7691_denford

Unbundling cases could offer a helping hand to litigants in person, as Robin Denford explains

Lord Justice Briggs’s ongoing consideration and review of reforms to the civil courts structure includes considering what steps could be taken to minimise the impact and struggles of the increasing number of litigants in person (LIP) in the court system. This is of particular interest as I am part of a working group in Bristol County Court, guided by DJ Cope, which is focused on what additional support can be given to litigants in person.

One suggestion I made, after a recent directions hearing over a possession case, was that my instructing solicitor could send a blank “List of Documents” form to the defendant to complete so that he could comply with the direction for disclosure. This would be sent along with a template for a witness statement to help him with the structure of the statements he would have to produce to refute the council’s claim for possession. I have also suggested that all court orders could contain a link

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll