header-logo header-logo

12 February 2010 / Andrew Parker
Issue: 7404 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

More than a quick fix

Fourteen years ago Lord Woolf advocated a fast track for low value claims. Inherent in his proposals was the idea of a matrix of fixed costs for all claims within the track limits.

Fourteen years ago Lord Woolf advocated a fast track for low value claims. Inherent in his proposals was the idea of a matrix of fixed costs for all claims within the track limits. In the end, however, he was persuaded to proceed with only limited fixed costs (for trial fees). Implementation of any further fixed costs since 1999 has been minimal.

It is no surprise Jackson LJ has set out to redress this, again advocating fixed costs in all fast track cases. The surprise may be that he has gone much further and has produced a matrix of figures for all personal injury accident cases within the fast track, with a commitment to extend this to employers’ liability disease cases within a few months.

This may not be the most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
Material obtained through US discovery applications may have a much longer legal life than many litigants realise
English courts are developing a distinctly practical approach to sanctions disputes arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
back-to-top-scroll