header-logo header-logo

Motor insurance—Rights of third parties against insurers—Duty of insurers to satisfy judgments against insured person

14 July 2011
Issue: 7474 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bristol Alliance Ltd Partnership v Williams and another [2011] EWHC 1657 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 17 (Jul)

Queen’s Bench Division, Tugendhat J, 1 July 2011

A motor insurer was liable to indemnify the claimant property insurers for damage done by a driver to a property, even though the damage was done deliberately and the claim was brought by the insurers by way of subrogation rather than the property owners themselves.

John Ross QC and Laura Johnson (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain) for the claimant. The first defendant did not appear and was not represented. Howard Palmer QC and Marie Louise Kinsler (instructed by Cordner Lewis) for the second defendant.

In December 2008, a car driven by the first defendant (the driver) collided with a department store in Bristol (the store). The property insurers paid the store’s claim and by subrogation brought an action against the driver. The driver’s motor insurers were joined as second defendant, because the property insurers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll