header-logo header-logo

08 December 2017
Issue: 7773 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Motor insurer liable while policyholder was walking

A groundbreaking High Court case where a motor insurer was held liable to pay compensation for an accident caused while the policyholder was walking, has settled for a ‘significant’ six-figure sum shortly before appeal. Gordon Woodward, crossing the road to his mobile burger van, collided with a motorbike ridden by Christopher Wastell, and died. Wastell sustained severe injuries, and sought compensation.

The High Court accepted Wastell’s solicitor’s argument that Woodward’s negligence ‘arose out of the use’ of his van. The case, Wastell v Woodward (Deceased) (unreported), settled in November.

Andrew Campbell, partner at Bikelawyer, who acted for Wastell, said the case was likely to encourage ‘more novel cases’ being brought where the defendant’s vehicle is ‘merely one part of what can often be a complex chain of events’.

Issue: 7773 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll