header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Adam Coomber
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

On the move

Increased mobility brings particular security challenges for the legal profession, says Adam Coomber

Mobile working continues to be a growing trend. Analyst firm Gartner Group has predicted that by 2011, 46.6m employees globally will spend at least one day a week working away from the office, and 112m will work from home at least one day a month. In the UK alone, 3.4m people, ie 12% of the working population, regularly or permanently work from home, according to the latest labour force survey from the Office for National Statistics.

For the legal profession, it's vital that a move towards a more mobile (client-facing and flexible) workforce does not end in competitive disadvantage, where legal professionals' billing ratios drop and the ability to service an optimum number of clients diminishes.

On the plus side, mobile working can increase work time, making legal professionals available 24 hours a day, seven days a week wherever they are. For some firms, enabling client-facing employees to work effectively, while on the move, ensures they are available to clients

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll