header-logo header-logo

On the move

22 May 2008 / Adam Coomber
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Increased mobility brings particular security challenges for the legal profession, says Adam Coomber

Mobile working continues to be a growing trend. Analyst firm Gartner Group has predicted that by 2011, 46.6m employees globally will spend at least one day a week working away from the office, and 112m will work from home at least one day a month. In the UK alone, 3.4m people, ie 12% of the working population, regularly or permanently work from home, according to the latest labour force survey from the Office for National Statistics.

For the legal profession, it's vital that a move towards a more mobile (client-facing and flexible) workforce does not end in competitive disadvantage, where legal professionals' billing ratios drop and the ability to service an optimum number of clients diminishes.

On the plus side, mobile working can increase work time, making legal professionals available 24 hours a day, seven days a week wherever they are. For some firms, enabling client-facing employees to work effectively, while on the move, ensures they are available to clients

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll