header-logo header-logo

27 January 2016
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

M&S PROFILE: Vicki Strachan

vicky_strachan_0

The Wynne-Jones partner relishes her new challenge as head of training

Vicki Strachan has recently joined the partnership of IP firm Wynne-Jones.

What was your route into the profession? 
I did a degree in electrical and electronic engineering, but it soon became clear that I would not be happy in a hands-on engineering role. I took a post with the UK Intellectual Property Office as an examiner and became fascinated by the law, but wanted to pursue a more commercial role in the longer term. A trainee post came up locally when I had been an examiner for just under two years, and the rest is history…

What has been your biggest career challenge so far? 
There have been lots of challenges, some good, some not so good. I think my greatest challenge will be in my current role as head of training for Wynne-Jones IP. I have been charged with setting up and running the Wynne-Jones Training Academy and currently have three trainees in my care. It is so important to me to ensure that they have a good experience of the training process and remain excited and passionate about Wynne-Jones and the profession as a whole, even though the first couple of years, especially, can be hard (I remember).  Standards of training vary greatly across the profession and I hope we will eventually become a centre of excellence in that regard. 

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?
I won’t name anyone, but I was trained by two true gentlemen, and I am always inspired by people who can flourish in a commercial world without losing sight of their core human values.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?
I would be a teacher. I have a post-graduate certificate of education and spent a couple of happy years lecturing at Gloucestershire College.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?
I used to love watching Ally McBeal.   

What change would you make to the profession?
The profession has already changed from when I joined it in 1994, and continues to do so. It is certainly becoming more inclusive. I would like to see patent law and practice made much more uniform across the world, which would ultimately benefit businesses and entrepreneurs greatly in terms of cost and time to secure worldwide patent protection. But I don’t expect that to happen in my lifetime!

How do you relax?
Nothing makes me happier than spending quality time with my family—I wouldn’t call it relaxing (we have four children and a grandchild), but it is always fun.

Issue: 7683 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll