header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Caroline Wright
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

MVP

Why pensions merit attention throughout a divorce, explains Caroline Wright

Pensions can be the most valuable asset after the matrimonial home in a divorce. This is all the more likely to be the case for the over-60s. As a potentially valuable asset likely to have been built up over a long period of time, it is critical for practitioners to give proper consideration to valuation issues at an early stage before turning to how the pension might be shared at the point negotiations begin.

Valuation issues

The first step is always to obtain the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) from the pension provider. Depending on the value, the type of pension and the way in which it is proposed to be dealt with, further expert valuation from an actuary is likely to be required. As a rule of thumb, it will usually be proportionate to instruct an actuary if the CETV is more than £250,000.

Due attention must be paid to the nature of the pension when considering valuation issues. For example, valuations of private company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll