header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Caroline Wright
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

MVP

Why pensions merit attention throughout a divorce, explains Caroline Wright

Pensions can be the most valuable asset after the matrimonial home in a divorce. This is all the more likely to be the case for the over-60s. As a potentially valuable asset likely to have been built up over a long period of time, it is critical for practitioners to give proper consideration to valuation issues at an early stage before turning to how the pension might be shared at the point negotiations begin.

Valuation issues

The first step is always to obtain the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) from the pension provider. Depending on the value, the type of pension and the way in which it is proposed to be dealt with, further expert valuation from an actuary is likely to be required. As a rule of thumb, it will usually be proportionate to instruct an actuary if the CETV is more than £250,000.

Due attention must be paid to the nature of the pension when considering valuation issues. For example, valuations of private company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll