header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Caroline Wright
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

MVP

Why pensions merit attention throughout a divorce, explains Caroline Wright

Pensions can be the most valuable asset after the matrimonial home in a divorce. This is all the more likely to be the case for the over-60s. As a potentially valuable asset likely to have been built up over a long period of time, it is critical for practitioners to give proper consideration to valuation issues at an early stage before turning to how the pension might be shared at the point negotiations begin.

Valuation issues

The first step is always to obtain the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) from the pension provider. Depending on the value, the type of pension and the way in which it is proposed to be dealt with, further expert valuation from an actuary is likely to be required. As a rule of thumb, it will usually be proportionate to instruct an actuary if the CETV is more than £250,000.

Due attention must be paid to the nature of the pension when considering valuation issues. For example, valuations of private company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll