header-logo header-logo

MVP

02 September 2010 / Caroline Wright
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Why pensions merit attention throughout a divorce, explains Caroline Wright

Pensions can be the most valuable asset after the matrimonial home in a divorce. This is all the more likely to be the case for the over-60s. As a potentially valuable asset likely to have been built up over a long period of time, it is critical for practitioners to give proper consideration to valuation issues at an early stage before turning to how the pension might be shared at the point negotiations begin.

Valuation issues

The first step is always to obtain the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) from the pension provider. Depending on the value, the type of pension and the way in which it is proposed to be dealt with, further expert valuation from an actuary is likely to be required. As a rule of thumb, it will usually be proportionate to instruct an actuary if the CETV is more than £250,000.

Due attention must be paid to the nature of the pension when considering valuation issues. For example, valuations of private company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll