header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

National Health Service

R (on the application of Forge Care Homes Ltd and others) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and others) [2017] UKSC 56, [2017] All ER (D) 10 (Aug)

The case concerned the question of who was legally responsible for paying for the work done by registered nurses in social rather than health care settings. The Supreme Court, in providing guidance to that question set out the circumstances where ‘nursing care by a registered nurse’, as stated in s 49(2) of the Health and Social Care Act 2001, occurred. It was held that the respondent health boards had misinterpreted s 49(2) such that it had been plain that Parliament had envisaged that some care services would be included beyond those which could only be provided by a registered nurse.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll