header-logo header-logo

Negligence

02 April 2010
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Connor v Surrey County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 286, [2010] All ER (D) 233 (Mar)

A person who owed a duty of care to another could be required to fulfil that pre-existing private law duty by the exercise of a public law discretion, but only if that might be done consistently with the duty-ower’s full performance of his public law obligations. That did not offend the principle that public bodies’ acts or omissions which were authorised by Parliament would not, though they cause injury, sound in damages recoverable by private law cause of action.

The demands of a private law duty of care could not justify, far less require, action or inaction by a public authority which would be unlawful in public law terms. The standard tests of legality, rationality and fairness had to be met as they applied to the use of the public law power in a particular case. If the case was one where the action’s severity had to be measured against its effectiveness, it had also to be proportionate to whatever was the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll