header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 February 2011
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Negligence—Duty of care—Nightclub owner

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Everett and another v Comojo (UK) Ltd t/a The Metropolitan and others [2011] EWCA Civ 13, [2011] All ER (D) 106 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Rix, Smith and Richards LJJ,
18 Jan 2011

Management of a nightclub owe a duty of care in respect of the actions of third parties on the premises, to the extent that it is fair, just and reasonable.
 
Simon Butler and Johnathan Payne (instructed by Stone Rowe Brewer LLP) for the claimants. Lord Faulks QC and Quintin Tudor-Evans (instructed by Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP) for the defendant.

The claimants were guests at a nightclub, which was managed by the defendant. Use of the nightclub was restricted to members and their guests, save that residents of the hotel, of which it was a part, were also permitted to use it. During the evening, a fracas occurred in which the claimants were stabbed. They brought proceedings against the defendant, alleging that it had failed to take appropriate steps to protect its guests. The issue arose as to whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll