header-logo header-logo

06 January 2012 / Annapurna Waughray
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The new apartheid?

Caste discrimination has shed its cloak of invisibility, says Annapurna Waughray

I last wrote for NLJ in 2007 highlighting the lack of official recognition of caste discrimination in UK law. I argued that the Equalities Review—the overhaul of the UK’s equality framework which culminated in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010)—provided an ideal opportunity to bring caste within the ambit of discrimination law (see “Caste: invisible discrimination?”157 NLJ 7263, pp 348-349). In the event, the Labour government decided not to add caste to the list of protected characteristics in the Equality Bill, citing as the main reason the lack of evidence of caste discrimination in spheres covered by discrimination legislation.

Moving forward, in November 2009 the Anti Caste Discrimination Alliance, a non-governmental organisation, published Hidden Apartheid: Voice of the Community, a report highlighting lower-caste experiences of caste discrimination in the UK in legally protected spheres (employment, education, provision of services and so on). The report’s title referred to the comparison between caste and the practice of untouchability in India, and apartheid, made by Human

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll