header-logo header-logo

The new apartheid?

06 January 2012 / Annapurna Waughray
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Caste discrimination has shed its cloak of invisibility, says Annapurna Waughray

I last wrote for NLJ in 2007 highlighting the lack of official recognition of caste discrimination in UK law. I argued that the Equalities Review—the overhaul of the UK’s equality framework which culminated in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010)—provided an ideal opportunity to bring caste within the ambit of discrimination law (see “Caste: invisible discrimination?”157 NLJ 7263, pp 348-349). In the event, the Labour government decided not to add caste to the list of protected characteristics in the Equality Bill, citing as the main reason the lack of evidence of caste discrimination in spheres covered by discrimination legislation.

Moving forward, in November 2009 the Anti Caste Discrimination Alliance, a non-governmental organisation, published Hidden Apartheid: Voice of the Community, a report highlighting lower-caste experiences of caste discrimination in the UK in legally protected spheres (employment, education, provision of services and so on). The report’s title referred to the comparison between caste and the practice of untouchability in India, and apartheid, made by Human

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll