header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007 / John Ludlow
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A new beginning?

Gordon Brown has shown he is willing to duck convention, but his legislative programme contains few surprises so far, says John Ludlow

The start of the summer recess often feels like the end of the Parliamentary session. As the Houses prepare to rise, most MPs and peers visibly wind down and if ministers seem to buck the trend it’s only because they are frantically trying to get as many Bills as they can on the statute book before the holiday season starts. The big front bench reshuffles, so common around this time, only add to the general sense that we are at a change-over point.

And this year is certainly no exception. The final sitting week saw a clutch of measures receive Royal Assent, including the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill, the Offender Management Bill and the controversial Mental Health and Corporate Manslaughter Bills. The bulk of the government’s legislative programme is now safely through.

As for the reshuffle, the arrival of Gordon Brown as prime minister prompted even bigger changes than usual, even

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll