header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007 / John Ludlow
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A new beginning?

Gordon Brown has shown he is willing to duck convention, but his legislative programme contains few surprises so far, says John Ludlow

The start of the summer recess often feels like the end of the Parliamentary session. As the Houses prepare to rise, most MPs and peers visibly wind down and if ministers seem to buck the trend it’s only because they are frantically trying to get as many Bills as they can on the statute book before the holiday season starts. The big front bench reshuffles, so common around this time, only add to the general sense that we are at a change-over point.

And this year is certainly no exception. The final sitting week saw a clutch of measures receive Royal Assent, including the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill, the Offender Management Bill and the controversial Mental Health and Corporate Manslaughter Bills. The bulk of the government’s legislative programme is now safely through.

As for the reshuffle, the arrival of Gordon Brown as prime minister prompted even bigger changes than usual, even

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll