header-logo header-logo

24 May 2012 / Simon Love
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

The new deal?

Simon Love assesses the proposed new role for SRA Compensation Fund

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Compensation Fund is a central element of the regime by which the solicitors profession protects the financial interests of its clients. Economic hard times have increased the fund’s workload: mortgage lenders have brought high volumes of claims against solicitors arising out of fraudulent transactions, and following declinature of cover by the firms’ professional indemnity insurers, many of those have been switched to the fund; the recession has caused the failure of a number of law firms; and planned changes to the profession’s indemnity insurance arrangements will impact further on the fund and present fresh challenges.

In this article I will take a look at the Compensation Fund, its rules and how it operates at present. I will then go on to highlight the planned changes to the operation of the fund, the background to those, and the impact on the fund in the future.

SRA Compensation Fund

The Compensation Fund is a discretionary scheme established under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll