header-logo header-logo

24 May 2012 / Simon Love
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

The new deal?

Simon Love assesses the proposed new role for SRA Compensation Fund

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Compensation Fund is a central element of the regime by which the solicitors profession protects the financial interests of its clients. Economic hard times have increased the fund’s workload: mortgage lenders have brought high volumes of claims against solicitors arising out of fraudulent transactions, and following declinature of cover by the firms’ professional indemnity insurers, many of those have been switched to the fund; the recession has caused the failure of a number of law firms; and planned changes to the profession’s indemnity insurance arrangements will impact further on the fund and present fresh challenges.

In this article I will take a look at the Compensation Fund, its rules and how it operates at present. I will then go on to highlight the planned changes to the operation of the fund, the background to those, and the impact on the fund in the future.

SRA Compensation Fund

The Compensation Fund is a discretionary scheme established under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll