header-logo header-logo

The new deal?

24 May 2012 / Simon Love
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Simon Love assesses the proposed new role for SRA Compensation Fund

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Compensation Fund is a central element of the regime by which the solicitors profession protects the financial interests of its clients. Economic hard times have increased the fund’s workload: mortgage lenders have brought high volumes of claims against solicitors arising out of fraudulent transactions, and following declinature of cover by the firms’ professional indemnity insurers, many of those have been switched to the fund; the recession has caused the failure of a number of law firms; and planned changes to the profession’s indemnity insurance arrangements will impact further on the fund and present fresh challenges.

In this article I will take a look at the Compensation Fund, its rules and how it operates at present. I will then go on to highlight the planned changes to the operation of the fund, the background to those, and the impact on the fund in the future.

SRA Compensation Fund

The Compensation Fund is a discretionary scheme established under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll