header-logo header-logo

17 July 2019
Issue: 7849 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

New Domestic Abuse Bill

Expanded definition to include economic abuse, coercive control & manipulation

A landmark Domestic Abuse Bill to tackle the issue and protect victims was laid before Parliament this week.

It includes the first statutory definition of domestic abuse, which will include economic abuse, coercive control and manipulation; prohibits the cross-examination of victims by their abusers in the family courts; establishes a Domestic Abuse Commissioner to champion victims and survivors; creates Domestic Abuse Protection Orders (DAPOs) to place restrictions on offenders; and gives automatic eligibility for special measures to support more victims to give evidence in the criminal courts.

A draft bill was published in January, following a public consultation that received more than 3,200 responses, and scrutinised by a joint Parliamentary committee. The government accepted the majority of the committee’s recommendations and has committed to further amendments as the bill progresses.

Prime Minister Theresa May said: ‘Domestic abuse can take many forms, from horrific physical violence to coercive behaviour that robs people of their self-esteem, their freedom and their right to feel safe in their own homes, but the immense bravery I’ve seen demonstrated by survivors is consistent throughout.’

The government also announced this week that it will ensure access to refuges for asylum seekers suffering domestic abuse and review the statutory response to migrant victims of domestic abuse.

Rights of Women (ROW), which provides free legal advice to women, said it welcomed the ban on direct cross-examination of victims but remained ‘concerned that the drafting of the provision is insufficient to fully protect women from abuse’. It called for extra safeguards to ensure DAPOs work effectively, including making sufficient resources and legal aid available to ensure victims’ views are central to decision-making, giving police rather than the victim responsibility, where appropriate, for applying for the order, and adequate monitoring of compliance with orders.

ROW, the Step Up Migrant Women coalition and other groups called for greater protection of migrant women suffering abuse, regardless of immigration status.  

Issue: 7849 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll