header-logo header-logo

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

New guidance on child witnesses

Family Justice Council produce new guidelines on children giving live evidence in family proceedings

The Family Justice Council (FJC) has published new guidelines on children giving live evidence in family proceedings.

An FJC working party, chaired by Lord Justice Thorpe, was set up after a referral to the Supreme Court from the Court of Appeal in the case of Re W (children) (abuse: oral evidence) [2010] EWCA Civ 57, which considered the issue of children’s evidence. In March 2010, the Supreme Court removed the presumption that only in exceptional cases should a child be called to give live evidence in family proceedings (Re W [2010] UKSC 12).

The working party says its research suggests the number of applications for children to give evidence may be increasing since the ruling.
 

Its guidelines provide points to be taken into consideration by the court when deciding whether a child should be asked to give live evidence, and a list of “dos and don’ts” for lawyers questioning children.
 

It emphasises that the court should “consider seriously” alternatives to the child appearing at a hearing, and points out that hearsay evidence is admissible in family proceedings.
 

The guidelines advise that all advocates have a responsibility to manage the questioning of a child witness fairly, but that ultimate responsibility rests with the court.

Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
A client cannot use a costs assessment to investigate whether their solicitor received commission on an after-the-event (ATE) insurance premium, the Court of Appeal has held
Law firms cannot be compelled to disclose documents protected by unwaived legal professional privilege (LPP) during misconduct investigations, the High Court has clarified
Solicitors have urged regulators not to impose unnecessary cost and complexity on third-party litigation funding
International demand for UK legal services is surging, with exports at record levels, according to Law Society research
back-to-top-scroll