header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A new morality

Jon Holbrook pays tribute to the late Ronald Dworkin

Like all profound thinkers Professor Ronald Dworkin, who died in February, asked a big question and answered it by challenging a prevailing orthodoxy. To the question “what is the theoretical basis for law?” Dworkin locked horns with legal positivism or, as he described it, the ruling theory of his day. Legal positivism reached its apogee with HLA Hart’s arguments in The Concept of Law, published in 1961. To Professor Hart and other legal positivists law was about systems of rule making and structures of governance. Judges decided cases by applying previous judicial decisions and by drawing, where necessary, on the social standards and customs of the day. By studying these systems and structures the law could be discovered: the law was what had been posited.

Legal positivism

The impact of legal positivism can readily be seen in the conservative evolution of the British common law. Despite his flamboyance, Lord Denning, whose judicial career spanned from 1944 to 1982, practised legal positivism. Denning, often referred

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll