header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A new morality

Jon Holbrook pays tribute to the late Ronald Dworkin

Like all profound thinkers Professor Ronald Dworkin, who died in February, asked a big question and answered it by challenging a prevailing orthodoxy. To the question “what is the theoretical basis for law?” Dworkin locked horns with legal positivism or, as he described it, the ruling theory of his day. Legal positivism reached its apogee with HLA Hart’s arguments in The Concept of Law, published in 1961. To Professor Hart and other legal positivists law was about systems of rule making and structures of governance. Judges decided cases by applying previous judicial decisions and by drawing, where necessary, on the social standards and customs of the day. By studying these systems and structures the law could be discovered: the law was what had been posited.

Legal positivism

The impact of legal positivism can readily be seen in the conservative evolution of the British common law. Despite his flamboyance, Lord Denning, whose judicial career spanned from 1944 to 1982, practised legal positivism. Denning, often referred

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll