header-logo header-logo

A new morality

10 May 2013 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Jon Holbrook pays tribute to the late Ronald Dworkin

Like all profound thinkers Professor Ronald Dworkin, who died in February, asked a big question and answered it by challenging a prevailing orthodoxy. To the question “what is the theoretical basis for law?” Dworkin locked horns with legal positivism or, as he described it, the ruling theory of his day. Legal positivism reached its apogee with HLA Hart’s arguments in The Concept of Law, published in 1961. To Professor Hart and other legal positivists law was about systems of rule making and structures of governance. Judges decided cases by applying previous judicial decisions and by drawing, where necessary, on the social standards and customs of the day. By studying these systems and structures the law could be discovered: the law was what had been posited.

Legal positivism

The impact of legal positivism can readily be seen in the conservative evolution of the British common law. Despite his flamboyance, Lord Denning, whose judicial career spanned from 1944 to 1982, practised legal positivism. Denning, often referred

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll