header-logo header-logo

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New planning regime fuels concerns

Lawyers warn against government shake-up of planning policy

The government’s shake-up of planning policy could lead to delays and more appeals, planning lawyers have warned.

Last week, the government unveiled the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which aims to simplify the planning process, put local not national government in charge of decisions, and introduces a presumption in favour of sustainable development.

Tim Johnson, real estate partner at DAC Beachcroft, says: “There are parts of the policy that are likely to cause delays through the need for appeals or judicial interpretation, particularly, for instance, the meaning of ‘limited degree of conflict with this Framework’ when considering what weight an adopted policy is to be given.Overall, the NPPF seeks to achieve a balance as it should; however, we continue to wonder whether it has resulted in policies that, in trying to satisfy all, will end up satisfying nobody.”

Jen Hawkins, solicitor, LexisPSL Environment, says: “The approach of the NPPF seems to be more of a ‘slash-and-burn’ than a ‘consolidation’ exercise. While environmental campaigners are more happy with the refined concept of ‘sustainable development’, which now refers to the five principles of the UK sustainable development strategy, tipping the balance between economic and environmental considerations inevitably renders it less ‘pro-growth’ than its former draft form. This more detailed definition offers a new hook for environmental non-governmental organisations to latch onto, providing a policy basis on which to tackle global environmental impacts. It is easy to argue that developments such as the third runway at Heathrow are not conducive to ‘living within the planet’s environmental needs’.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll