header-logo header-logo

New planning regime fuels concerns

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers warn against government shake-up of planning policy

The government’s shake-up of planning policy could lead to delays and more appeals, planning lawyers have warned.

Last week, the government unveiled the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which aims to simplify the planning process, put local not national government in charge of decisions, and introduces a presumption in favour of sustainable development.

Tim Johnson, real estate partner at DAC Beachcroft, says: “There are parts of the policy that are likely to cause delays through the need for appeals or judicial interpretation, particularly, for instance, the meaning of ‘limited degree of conflict with this Framework’ when considering what weight an adopted policy is to be given.Overall, the NPPF seeks to achieve a balance as it should; however, we continue to wonder whether it has resulted in policies that, in trying to satisfy all, will end up satisfying nobody.”

Jen Hawkins, solicitor, LexisPSL Environment, says: “The approach of the NPPF seems to be more of a ‘slash-and-burn’ than a ‘consolidation’ exercise. While environmental campaigners are more happy with the refined concept of ‘sustainable development’, which now refers to the five principles of the UK sustainable development strategy, tipping the balance between economic and environmental considerations inevitably renders it less ‘pro-growth’ than its former draft form. This more detailed definition offers a new hook for environmental non-governmental organisations to latch onto, providing a policy basis on which to tackle global environmental impacts. It is easy to argue that developments such as the third runway at Heathrow are not conducive to ‘living within the planet’s environmental needs’.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll