header-logo header-logo

17 November 2011 / Mark Surguy , Saida Joseph
Issue: 7490 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Technology
printer mail-detail

New review

Mark Surguy & Saida Joseph examine the latest methods for the outsourcing of document review

 

In Lord Justice Jackson’s litigation costs report last year, he noted that the growth in electronically-stored information (ESI) has directly led to the increase in legal costs, particularly those associated with the disclosure process. As advances in technology continue, more and more information is transmitted and stored electronically, via smart phones, tablets, multiple mobile phone devices, and communication terminals such as Bloomberg, as well as traditional desk top machines, databases and servers. Does this mean that legal costs are equally going to increase in line with this ever-expanding volume of ESI?
 
Modern disclosure process

The modern disclosure process is made up of a number of features, including locating, collecting, processing and reviewing the electronic data. Document review is commonly thought of as the most expensive element of any electronic disclosure exercise and can account for as much as 60%-85% of the total cost of a
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll