header-logo header-logo

17 November 2011 / Mark Surguy , Saida Joseph
Issue: 7490 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Technology
printer mail-detail

New review

Mark Surguy & Saida Joseph examine the latest methods for the outsourcing of document review

 

In Lord Justice Jackson’s litigation costs report last year, he noted that the growth in electronically-stored information (ESI) has directly led to the increase in legal costs, particularly those associated with the disclosure process. As advances in technology continue, more and more information is transmitted and stored electronically, via smart phones, tablets, multiple mobile phone devices, and communication terminals such as Bloomberg, as well as traditional desk top machines, databases and servers. Does this mean that legal costs are equally going to increase in line with this ever-expanding volume of ESI?
 
Modern disclosure process

The modern disclosure process is made up of a number of features, including locating, collecting, processing and reviewing the electronic data. Document review is commonly thought of as the most expensive element of any electronic disclosure exercise and can account for as much as 60%-85% of the total cost of a
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll