header-logo header-logo

17 November 2011 / Mark Surguy , Saida Joseph
Issue: 7490 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Technology
printer mail-detail

New review

Mark Surguy & Saida Joseph examine the latest methods for the outsourcing of document review

 

In Lord Justice Jackson’s litigation costs report last year, he noted that the growth in electronically-stored information (ESI) has directly led to the increase in legal costs, particularly those associated with the disclosure process. As advances in technology continue, more and more information is transmitted and stored electronically, via smart phones, tablets, multiple mobile phone devices, and communication terminals such as Bloomberg, as well as traditional desk top machines, databases and servers. Does this mean that legal costs are equally going to increase in line with this ever-expanding volume of ESI?
 
Modern disclosure process

The modern disclosure process is made up of a number of features, including locating, collecting, processing and reviewing the electronic data. Document review is commonly thought of as the most expensive element of any electronic disclosure exercise and can account for as much as 60%-85% of the total cost of a
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll