header-logo header-logo

A new take on training

01 November 2013 / Julie Brannan
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail
istock_000022228802medium

Julie Brannan breaks down the SRA’s proposed new flexible approach to continuing professional development

The Legal Education and Training Review (LETR), published in July this year, confirmed that while the current system of education and training has served the profession and the public well, it now needs to move with the times. Today’s lawyers are delivering legal services in increasingly diverse ways and through a growing variety of business models. Consumer demand and digital delivery are fundamentally reshaping the legal services market. These changes demand a new approach to securing standards of competence, including the continuing competence of solicitors.

 

New CPD model

The LETR report recommended the adoption of “Models of [continuing professional development] CPD that require participants to plan, implement, evaluate and reflect annually on their training needs and their learning...This approach may, but need not, prescribe minimum hours. If a time requirement is not included, a robust approach to monitoring planning and performance must be developed to ensure appropriate activity is undertaken.”

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll