header-logo header-logo

A new take on training

01 November 2013 / Julie Brannan
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail
istock_000022228802medium

Julie Brannan breaks down the SRA’s proposed new flexible approach to continuing professional development

The Legal Education and Training Review (LETR), published in July this year, confirmed that while the current system of education and training has served the profession and the public well, it now needs to move with the times. Today’s lawyers are delivering legal services in increasingly diverse ways and through a growing variety of business models. Consumer demand and digital delivery are fundamentally reshaping the legal services market. These changes demand a new approach to securing standards of competence, including the continuing competence of solicitors.

 

New CPD model

The LETR report recommended the adoption of “Models of [continuing professional development] CPD that require participants to plan, implement, evaluate and reflect annually on their training needs and their learning...This approach may, but need not, prescribe minimum hours. If a time requirement is not included, a robust approach to monitoring planning and performance must be developed to ensure appropriate activity is undertaken.”

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll