header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Anna Worwood , Edward Floyd
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

The New Vogue?

Anna Worwood & Edward Floyd consider the tactical use of shared residence orders

The Court of Appeal had not considered the question of internal relocation within England and Wales where a shared residence order was in place until the recent case of Re L (a child) (shared residence order); T (a child) [2009] EWCA Civ 20.

This case concerned the mother’s appeal against a refusal to grant her permission to relocate with her daughter, L, from to to pursue an employment offer. The mother was British but had an Israeli passport. The father was Serbian, but settled in . The mother and father’s relationship began in 1999. They had one child, L, who was born in 2004. Their relationship ended in 2005 when the mother left with L. After separation, between 2005 and 2007, both the parents lived in and the father played a substantial role in L’s life. In September 2007, after being made redundant, the mother applied to the court to relocate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll