header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Anna Worwood , Edward Floyd
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

The New Vogue?

Anna Worwood & Edward Floyd consider the tactical use of shared residence orders

The Court of Appeal had not considered the question of internal relocation within England and Wales where a shared residence order was in place until the recent case of Re L (a child) (shared residence order); T (a child) [2009] EWCA Civ 20.

This case concerned the mother’s appeal against a refusal to grant her permission to relocate with her daughter, L, from to to pursue an employment offer. The mother was British but had an Israeli passport. The father was Serbian, but settled in . The mother and father’s relationship began in 1999. They had one child, L, who was born in 2004. Their relationship ended in 2005 when the mother left with L. After separation, between 2005 and 2007, both the parents lived in and the father played a substantial role in L’s life. In September 2007, after being made redundant, the mother applied to the court to relocate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll