header-logo header-logo

​New year: same headache?

07 January 2016 / David Greene
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7681_greene

David Greene welcomes the government’s recent U-turn on upping civil court fees but fears the reprieve may be short-lived

2015 ended on a high note with a piece of good news from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) telling us that the increase in the court fees cap that had been proposed is not to proceed for the time being. The government’s response paper painted a picture of wholesale opposition to the increase. Of 110 responses, 103 disagreed with the proposal. Even with that opposition, one always wonders whether it makes any difference. On this occasion it seems to have done so. Perhaps, however, it is a short lived reprieve. In any event civil courts may have achieved a reprieve but many of the proposed increases of fees in other tribunals are being implemented.

Domestic & international arguments

Two arguments always surround the issue of court fees, one domestic and the other international. The domestic question is the balancing exercise between a civil justice process that pays for itself (thus meeting the Osborne goal of an economy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll