header-logo header-logo

The next big thing?

07 September 2012 / Pablo Cortes
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Pablo Cortés provides some thoughts on the proposed consumer ADR & ODR initiatives

At the end of November 2011, the European Commission published two proposals in the field of consumer alternative dispute resolution (ADR). The first one is a Directive on consumer ADR that requires member states to ensure the provision and availability of ADR entities that comply with legal standards for resolving disputes between traders and consumers (COM(2011) 793/2). The second proposal is a Regulation on consumer online dispute resolution (ODR) which requires the establishment of a pan-European ODR platform that will become a single point of entry for resolving online consumer complaints arising from e-commerce (C(2011) 794/2). The platform, which is expected to be fully operational in 2015, will link complainants to approved ADR entities. Both proposals are due to be adopted into law by the end of 2012, and implemented in all member states 18 months later.

The commission proposal

The Directive on consumer ADR

The proposed ADR Directive requires member states to ensure the provision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll