header-logo header-logo

14 October 2016
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

NHS

R (on the application of Justice for Health Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2016] EWHC 2338 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 87 (Sep)

The Administrative Court dismissed an application on behalf of a group of junior doctors for judicial review, challenging the defendant secretary of state’s adoption of a decision to introduce new contract terms and conditions for NHS employees. The court held that that decision fell within the scope of the secretary of state’s powers under the National Health Service Act 2006, and that he had not exercised any statutory power to compel employers within the NHS to introduce the proposed terms and conditions, in respect of which individual employers were free to negotiate with employees. Further, there had been no breach of the principles of transparency or good administration and the secretary of state’s decision had not been irrational.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll