header-logo header-logo

NHS

14 October 2016
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Justice for Health Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2016] EWHC 2338 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 87 (Sep)

The Administrative Court dismissed an application on behalf of a group of junior doctors for judicial review, challenging the defendant secretary of state’s adoption of a decision to introduce new contract terms and conditions for NHS employees. The court held that that decision fell within the scope of the secretary of state’s powers under the National Health Service Act 2006, and that he had not exercised any statutory power to compel employers within the NHS to introduce the proposed terms and conditions, in respect of which individual employers were free to negotiate with employees. Further, there had been no breach of the principles of transparency or good administration and the secretary of state’s decision had not been irrational.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Gustina Singgih

Charles Russell Speechlys—Gustina Singgih

Corporate team in London welcomes new partner

Church Court Chambers—Maria Karaiskos KC

Church Court Chambers—Maria Karaiskos KC

Historic appointment of chambers' first female head

Wright Hassall—five promotions

Wright Hassall—five promotions

Firm announces five promotions, including new partner

NEWS
Proposed legislation to tighten the rules on pooled client accounts would place ‘substantial’ burdens on solicitors, the Law Society has warned
Increasing numbers of family mediators are cutting back on legal aid work or leaving the sector altogether due to low fees—creating a supply shortfall for low-income families
Lawyers acting in cases funded by damages-based agreements (DBAs) cannot claim their share of the damages if no damages are awarded, the High Court has clarified
Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to a Ministry of Justice decision to increase Crown Court sitting days
Barristers have been targeted with death threats, rape threats, threats to their family members, physical surveillance and threats from politicians, chair of the Bar Barbara Mills KC has reported
back-to-top-scroll