header-logo header-logo

NHS litigation reform: getting it right

10 December 2021 / Hugh Johnson , Miriam Spencer
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Features , National Health Service
printer mail-detail
66827
Hugh Johnson & Miriam Spencer weigh up the current system of litigating against the NHS: is root-and-branch reform the answer?
  • Responses to the Health and Social Care Committee’s consultation on NHS litigation suggest that improvements to the current system, as opposed to wholesale reform, are the way forward.
  • Suggested improvements include a more robust system of investigation and the dissemination of lessons learnt throughout the NHS, to avoid the same mistakes happening again.

The Health and Social Care Committee recently invited evidence on NHS litigation reform in the light of perceived increasing litigation costs. More than 60 written responses to the consultation were received from a range of interested parties, including the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB), the Bar Council, claimant and defendant law firms, and healthcare providers. Most recently, the committee heard oral evidence from legal experts and the families of those affected by failures in NHS care.

The frame of reference for the consultation indicated that the committee would look at several themes as part

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
back-to-top-scroll