header-logo header-logo

NHS litigation reform: getting it right

10 December 2021 / Hugh Johnson , Miriam Spencer
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Features , National Health Service
printer mail-detail
66827
Hugh Johnson & Miriam Spencer weigh up the current system of litigating against the NHS: is root-and-branch reform the answer?
  • Responses to the Health and Social Care Committee’s consultation on NHS litigation suggest that improvements to the current system, as opposed to wholesale reform, are the way forward.
  • Suggested improvements include a more robust system of investigation and the dissemination of lessons learnt throughout the NHS, to avoid the same mistakes happening again.

The Health and Social Care Committee recently invited evidence on NHS litigation reform in the light of perceived increasing litigation costs. More than 60 written responses to the consultation were received from a range of interested parties, including the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB), the Bar Council, claimant and defendant law firms, and healthcare providers. Most recently, the committee heard oral evidence from legal experts and the families of those affected by failures in NHS care.

The frame of reference for the consultation indicated that the committee would look at several themes as part

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll