header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Legal services , Career focus
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: AI shortcuts leave lawyers facing courtroom fallout

254463
© Getty images
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks

Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Charanjit Singh, tenant and barrister-at-law at Holborn Chambers and senior lawyer (general counsel) at the Nursing and Midwifery Council, warns that more than 60 UK cases have already involved AI-generated false authorities.

Reviewing recent decisions, including Cork v Smith and Re A, B, C, D, he argues lawyers must never 'outsource the thinking process' to AI, particularly where hallucinated citations can mislead the court. While retrieval-augmented generation systems improve reliability, Singh says technology is no substitute for auditable human verification. He also cautions supervisors against overreliance on junior staff using AI, noting that reputational damage, regulatory investigations and even contempt proceedings may follow unchecked errors.

Used responsibly, he concludes, AI can still be a 'transformative tool'.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll