header-logo header-logo

05 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Alarm bells over Mazur

237727
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week

He describes a bewildering situation in which long-trusted legal executives, once central to litigation teams, now risk being side-lined as mere ‘ciphers’. He traces the problem to regulatory drift following the Legal Services Act 2007 and the growth of mass-market litigation models fuelled by ‘no win no fee’ practices.

Meanwhile, unqualified caseworkers in some modern claims factories are producing erroneous witness statements referencing vehicles or banks that never existed.

Philpott argues that the solution is simple: the regulator must restore clarity by confirming that all qualified CILEX members have rights to conduct litigation. With professions unsettled and livelihoods at stake, he suggests that intervention in the Mazur appeal may yet provide a much-needed corrective.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll