header-logo header-logo

24 April 2026
Issue: 8158 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , Dispute resolution
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Arbitration appeals face hard stop

247607
© Getty images
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end

In K1 v B, the Court of Appeal confirmed it has no jurisdiction to override that refusal, reinforcing finality. Attempts to bypass the rule via consent orders or legal manoeuvres failed.

The policy is clear—avoid ‘delay and expense’ by making first instance courts the gatekeepers. Arbitration means closure, not a second bite in the appellate court.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Greg Cox, Simpson Millar

NLJ Career Profile: Greg Cox, Simpson Millar

Simpson Millar CEO Greg Cox talks landmark cases, legal reform and why the profession is crying out for more simplicity

Winckworth Sherwood—Lee Ranford

Winckworth Sherwood—Lee Ranford

Partner joins team as head of restructuring

Burgess Mee—Susie Barter

Burgess Mee—Susie Barter

Family law firm strengthens offering with partner hire

NEWS
Behind the profession’s polished exterior, lawyers are ‘internally drained rather than physically tired’, according to a stark assessment of burnout in legal practice
Five years after the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 came into force, concerns remain that the family courts continue to minimise allegations of abuse in child contact disputes
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
back-to-top-scroll