header-logo header-logo

18 September 2026
Issue: 8177 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Privilege , Regulatory , Risk management , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Auditors tighten the disclosure screws

259137
© Getty images
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations

Writing in NLJ this week, Mark Beardsworth, Sharon Takhar and Nikara Rangesh of Signature Litigation say the reforms give auditors greater incentive to engage early with the FRC over fraud, misconduct and going-concern concerns. That could mean earlier demands for internal investigation material—and new danger for privilege, limited waivers and control of regulatory strategy.

Companies cannot assume an auditor will accept their view of whether documents are privileged; in A v B, the court confirmed that an auditor must form its own view.

The authors urge boards, audit committees and in-house lawyers to build privilege in from the outset, separate factual audit material from legal analysis, control waivers in writing and coordinate self-reporting decisions early. In this ‘new landscape’, disclosure is no longer administrative housekeeping: it is regulatory strategy.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll