header-logo header-logo

16 October 2026
Issue: 8181 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Criminal , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Blame game backfires

261502
© Getty images
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation

Writing in NLJ this week, Cameron Brown KC of Red Lion Chambers examines R v Grochiatskij, involving two convicted money launderers who sought new legal teams for Proceeds of Crime Act proceedings.

Their conviction appeals blamed their representatives, but those allegations were rejected. The Crown Court then refused to transfer legal aid and revoked the existing orders.

When the defendants refused to attend, the judge proceeded in their absence and imposed confiscation orders exceeding £14m each, with 14-year default terms.

The Court of Appeal upheld the approach, finding their disadvantages were ‘entirely of their own making’.

Brown warns that defendants have no unrestricted right to change lawyers at public expense. Nor must prosecutors undertake endless further investigations to revisit convictions: disclosure requires consideration of material that might cast doubt on their safety.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—Molly Rae

Shakespeare Martineau—Molly Rae

Shakespeare Martineau boosts Sheffield corporate team with new appointment

Stone King—Clare Harris

Stone King—Clare Harris

Stone King appoints new head of trusts and estates to spearhead growth as expansion continues

Browne Jacobson—David Hill

Browne Jacobson—David Hill

Browne Jacobson appoints David Hill as new health and life sciences partner with UK and international experience

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll