header-logo header-logo

16 October 2026
Issue: 8181 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Criminal , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Blame game backfires

261502
© Getty images
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation

Writing in NLJ this week, Cameron Brown KC of Red Lion Chambers examines R v Grochiatskij, involving two convicted money launderers who sought new legal teams for Proceeds of Crime Act proceedings.

Their conviction appeals blamed their representatives, but those allegations were rejected. The Crown Court then refused to transfer legal aid and revoked the existing orders.

When the defendants refused to attend, the judge proceeded in their absence and imposed confiscation orders exceeding £14m each, with 14-year default terms.

The Court of Appeal upheld the approach, finding their disadvantages were ‘entirely of their own making’.

Brown warns that defendants have no unrestricted right to change lawyers at public expense. Nor must prosecutors undertake endless further investigations to revisit convictions: disclosure requires consideration of material that might cast doubt on their safety.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll