header-logo header-logo

01 May 2026
Issue: 8159 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Mazur ruling puts firms on supervision alert

248365
© Getty images
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’

The decision reinforces that responsibility always rests with the authorised lawyer, even where tasks are delegated.

Alongside blockbuster judgments and costly litigation—from phone-hacking to failed investment schemes—the message is clear: regulators may ‘start looking closely at the conduct of firms’. With guidance evolving, firms ignoring supervision risks may soon find themselves in the spotlight.

Issue: 8159 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll