header-logo header-logo

22 May 2026
Issue: 8162 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Mazur ruling sparks fresh calls for litigation overhaul

250400
© Getty images
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice

Writing in NLJ this week, Stephen Nelson of Kingsley Napley says the ruling has intensified pressure for reform of the Legal Services Act 2007, describing current reserved legal activities as rooted in ‘historical anachronisms’.

Nelson argues the legislation has failed to keep pace with contemporary litigation teams, where paralegals, costs lawyers and litigation executives routinely undertake substantive work once carried out exclusively by solicitors. He notes that despite repeated judicial scrutiny, courts still cannot produce a definitive list of tasks falling within the conduct of litigation, with Sir Colin Birss acknowledging a ‘plea for clarity’ in Mazur.

Nelson suggests the Legal Services Board could revisit and redefine reserved activities to reflect modern practice and emerging risks, including the growing role of generative AI in legal services.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll