Until now, adults with shortened life expectancy could claim future lost income, but children could not—on grounds it was ‘too speculative’. Lord Reed rejected that logic, holding there was ‘no sound legal principle’ for the distinction. In CCC’s case, the lost years element alone was valued at over £800,000, on top of £6.8m in damages and lifelong care.
The shift will ‘very significantly’ increase claim values, demanding earlier expert input on likely career paths and life expectancy. Quantum battles will intensify—and litigation may grow longer and more complex.


