header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: The legal work of preparing corporate clients for public scrutiny

09 May 2025
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Company , Governance
printer mail-detail
217849
Demands for accountability are growing louder, with companies under the spotlight and asked to comment, give evidence to inquiries or explain themselves to the public on an increasingly frequent basis

In this week’s NLJ, Joanna Ludlam, partner at Jenner & Block, who specialises in this area, explains why lawyers need to prepare their clients thoroughly for such a scenario, and to include this in their corporate governance and legal strategy.

‘Forward-thinking and sophisticated legal advisers can play a vital role in coordinating local counsel and PR teams to ensure that they are fully briefed on the unified global strategy,’ writes Ludlam, who is co-chair of Jenner & Block’s investigations department and chair of its London public law and crisis management practice.

‘Whether providing advice on how to handle difficult questions, giving guidance on the tone and delivery, coordinating media strategies, or formulating a legal defence, the goal is to align the client’s reputation and interests with legal principles and ethical considerations.’ 

Issue: 8115 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Company , Governance
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll