header-logo header-logo

07 October 2022
Issue: 7997 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Personal injury , Costs , Clinical negligence
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Delay, delay, delay—should judges get a move on?

96614
In this week’s NLJ, Professor Dominic Regan laments the terrible delays faced by a claimant, who had food poisoning on holiday in 2014, whose claim was not given a fair trial and who has only just been given leave to appeal by the Supreme Court—eight years after falling ill. 

Regan writes: ‘Quite apart from the affront to justice that this case represents, it is astonishing that a judgment handed down on 7 October last year should only secure permission to appeal almost a year later. In an era where delay is (rightly) punished, it ill becomes the judiciary to appear to be moving slowly.’

Regan also covers judges’ choices (and other judges’ lack of choice), and the high cost of clinical negligence claims.

Read the latest 'The Insider' here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Magic Circle hire strengthens Sharpe Pritchard’s infrastructure finance capability

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin adds corporate crime specialist to growing dispute resolution team

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr Co strengthens private client team with partner appointment

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll