header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: In dread of fixed costs?

09 June 2023
Issue: 8028 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
125556
The fixed costs rules are almost here. Published at the end of last month although not effective until 1 October, ‘palpable anxiety is already coursing through the legal profession,’ Professor Dominic Regan reports in this week’s NLJ. 

As always, Regan, of City Law School, is at hand to provide the lowdown on what to expect.

If possible, the ‘well-organised’ may want to get started before the changes take place (the rules vary, depending on the subject matter). However, change is inevitable. Regan writes: ‘Those used to recovering costs at large will feel as if they have been mugged.’

He offers advice on how firms should prepare for the change, and addresses the concerns of the junior Bar—a cohort of the profession that is sadly likely to experience some ‘hurt’.

See Dominic Regan’s full column, 'The insider', here.

Issue: 8028 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll