header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: ‘Inappropriately ambitious’, and other costly costs mistakes

08 November 2024
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Costs decisions don’t always play out as expected, as Sophie Houghton, professional support lawyer in the dispute resolution team at LexisPSL, writes in this week’s NLJ

Houghton looks at two recent High Court decisions on the appropriate costs order to make following a costs management hearing.

‘In both cases, the master made clear that it should not be presumed by the parties that an order for “costs in the case” will be made following this type of hearing,’ she writes. ‘Although an order for “costs in the case” is frequently made at the end of a costs management hearing, parties may be in the habit of thinking that this will always happen, which is not the case.’

Houghton advises caution to those who might find themselves deemed ‘inappropriately ambitious’ in their calculations. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll