header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Pandemic exposes grim effect of cuts

12 August 2020
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Human rights
printer mail-detail
The COVID-19 pandemic ‘has revealed the bankruptcy of austerity ideology’, says Patrick Allen, NLJ columnist & senior partner, Hodge, Jones & Allen

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Allen lists some of the effects of cuts to the Ministry of Justice budget in the past 10 years, for example, 164 out of 320 magistrates’ courts have been closed, the number of prison staff has been cut by 30%, the number of police has been cut by 20,600 and legal aid spending fell by 37% between 2010 and 2017.

He calls for the justice budget to be restored at least to 2010 levels. ‘Government must spend to provide essential services for its citizens,’ Allen writes. ‘Many jobs would be created and the public benefit would be enormous.’

Issue: 7899 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Human rights
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll