header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Reform or revenge?

10 January 2020
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail
What does this term of Parliament have in store? 

‘Important gaps and uncertainties’ peppered the Queen’s Speech, notably the absence of any action ‘to repair the gaping holes in the legal system’, writes Sir Geoffrey Bindman QC, NLJ columnist, in NLJ this week.

Moreover, ‘specific reforms were not identified’ in the Conservative Party manifesto, although there is reference to updating the Human Rights Act and ensuring judicial review is ‘not abused’.

Sir Geoffrey asks whether the prime minister is ‘bent on revenge’ after being thwarted on prorogation by the Supreme Court? He urges lawyers to ‘keep a watchful eye’ on developments. 

Issue: 7869 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll