header-logo header-logo

03 February 2023
Issue: 8011 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Procedure & practice , Sanctions
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The dangers of suppressing evidence

108806
Barrister Dr Mike Wilkinson discusses the ‘do’s and don’ts’ of disclosure, in this week’s NLJ

In a fascinating article, available here, he covers the seriousness of suppressing documents and other evidence, including such unfathomable incidents as accidentally losing a phone in the North Sea (Vardy v Rooney).

Wilkinson, of 18 St John Street Chambers, covers the Roman law of ‘exploitation’ (wanton destruction of evidence), the drawing of adverse inferences where a document is ‘conspicuous by its absence’, and much more. He warns of the risk of penalty, noting ‘there are plenty of sanctions short of a complete strike-out’ which the court can apply. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll