header-logo header-logo

No to ad incentives for CMCs

15 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Djangoly: “complete ban on inducement advertising”

Claims management companies (CMCs) are to be banned from offering cash incentives to people who use their services.

Ministry of Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly has also announced a “complete ban on inducement advertising”.

He said regulatory action against CMCs had been stepped up over the last 12 months and a number were being “watched closely” by the regulatory body, the Claims Management Regulation (CMR) Unit.

The unit’s annual report for 2011–12, published last month, shows that more than 400 CMCs were suspended or warned in the last year. Of these, 260 were shut down.

Djanogly said: “This is a significant number and proves just how much work is going on to clamp down on CMCs that flout the rules and prey on consumers with over-zealous business tactics.

“The key focus of the CMR unit is to improve consumer protection by driving malpractice out of the claims management industry. We also want to see tougher rules enforced on CMCs and that’s why I am pleased to announce we are now introducing a complete ban on inducement advertising for this industry.

“No longer will CMCs be able to target consumers through advertisements which offer vulnerable individuals a cash incentive for signing up to use their services.”

Ministry of Justice head of claims management regulation Kevin Rousell says the mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI) led to a surge in the number of CMCs operating in the financial claims management sector.

“Poor practice is rife among some CMCs, who are falling over each other to get claimants’ business. To help tackle this we have set up a specialist team to root out the poor practices used by some companies presenting claims for mis-sold PPI.”

Rousell says the aim of the unit is not to stop CMCs trading but to make sure they operate responsibly.

“Flooding defendants, particularly lenders, with many thousands of poorly prepared claims is unacceptable and clogs up an already overloaded system, which can be of detriment to consumers with valid claims, as well as causing unnecessary additional processing costs.”

Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll